Loading...
Agenda Packet P&Z 11/19/2009Planning & Zoning Commission Trophy Club Entities Meeting Agenda 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262 Svore Municipal Building Boardroom7:00 PMThursday, November 19, 2009 Call To Order and announce a quorum. Approval of Minutes 1.09-504-T Review and approve minutes of the October 21, 2009 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. 102109.pdfAttachments: PUBLIC HEARING 2.09-505-T Public Hearing regarding an amendment to Planned Development District No. 13, "Village", Ordinance No. 95-20, Exhibit "C" Development Standards to delete, alter, and/or allow additional uses for Tract 2, Retail Use with Gasoline Island, an approximately 1.8 acre site. Applicant: The Dimension Group on behalf of 7-Eleven, Inc. (PD-AMD-09-032) Staff Report.pdfAttachments: 3.09-506-T Public Hearing to Consider an Amendment to PD-Planned Development District No. 27, Known as The Highlands at Trophy Club, Ordinance No. 2007-15 P&Z by amending Exhibit "B" - Development Standards, Section V. Neighborhood Regulations, Subsection "J" Village Center, Item 1. Permitted Uses. Applicant: Centurion Acquisitions, L.P. (PD AMD-09-030) Staff Report.pdf Village Center Regulations from PD-27.pdf Property Owner Notification.pdf List of Property Owners within 200 ft.pdf Public Hearing Notice - Newspaper.pdf Attachments: REGULAR SESSION 4.09-507-T Discussion and Recommendation regarding a request from Centurion Acquisitions, L.P. to amend Planned Development No. 27, Ordinance No. 2007-15 P&Z, Exhibit B "Development Standards", Section V. Neighborhood Regulations, Subsection "J" Village Center, Item 1. Permitted Uses. (PD-AMD-09-030) Adjourn Planning and Zoning Commission Page 1 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 November 19, 2009Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda *THE BOARD MAY CONVENE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS POSTED ITEMS AS ALLOWED BY THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT, TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE 551.071. Notice is hereby given that a quorum of the Town Council may be in attendance at this meeting. CERTIFICATION I certify that the above notice was posted on the front window of the Svore Municipal Building, 100 Municipal Drive, Trophy Club, Texas, on November 13, 2009, by 5:00 P.M. in accordance with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code. Carolyn Huggins Planning and Zoning Manager If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special needs, please contact the Town Secretary’s Office at 682-831-4600, 48 hours in advance and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. I certify that the attached notice and agenda of items to be considered by this Board was removed by me from the front window of the Svore Municipal Building, 100 Municipal Drive, Trophy Club, Texas, on the __________ day of ______________________, 2009 ________________________________, Title: ___________________________ Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262Trophy Club Entities Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:109-504-T Name: Status:Type:Agenda Item Regular Session File created:In control:11/13/2009 Planning & Zoning Commission On agenda:Final action:11/19/2009 Title:Review and approve minutes of the October 21, 2009 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Attachments:102109.pdf Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Planning and Zoning Commission Page 3 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 109-504-T Version:File #: Title Review and approve minutes of the October 21, 2009 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Planning and Zoning Commission Page 4 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OCTOBER 21, 2009 The Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas met on October 21, 2009, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 100 Municipal Drive, Trophy Club, and Texas 76262. COMMISSIONERS ATTENDANCE: Chairman Hill Present Vice Chairman Stephens Present Commissioner Reed Present Commissioner Sheridan Present Commissioner Forest Absent Commissioner Ashby Absent Commissioner Davidson Present STAFF AND GUESTS PRESENT: Carolyn Huggins Planning & Zoning Manager Mehrdad Moayedi Centurion American Steve Lenart Lenart Development Company, LLC Jaison Stephen Jacobs Engineering CALL TO ORDER AND ANNOUNCE A QUORUM. Chairman Hill called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. with a quorum present. 1 REVIEW AND APPROVE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 3, 2009 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. Commissioner Reed motioned to approve the minutes of the September 3, 2009, Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. The motion was seconded by Vice Chairman Stephens. Ayes: Hill, Stephens, Reed, Sheridan, Davidson Nays: None Action: 5-0, Approved Planning and Zoning Commission Page 5 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 2 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER CHANGES TO THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB CODE OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 3-BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION, ARTICLE XV-SWIMMING POOLS, AND CHAPTER 13- ZONING, ARTICLE V-SUPPLEMENTARY DISTRICT REGULATIONS, AFFECTING THE LOCATION OF SWIMMING POOLS. (ADM-09-005) Chairman Hill announced the case and opened the public hearing. There were no requests to speak. Chairman Hill closed the public hearing. 3 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2007-15 P&Z, PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 27, THE HIGHLANDS AT TROPHY CLUB, TO DELETE, ALTER, AND/OR ALLOW NEW LOT SIZE, CONFIGURATION AND AMENITIES FOR NEIGHBORHOOD 8, AN APPROXIMATELY 52.66 ACRE TRACT, AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS CHANGES TO PD-27 AS RELATED TO THIS REQUEST AS DEEMED NECESSARY. (PD-AMD-09-031) Chairman Hill announced the case and opened the public hearing. There were no citizens wishing to speak. Chairman Hill asked Ms. Huggins if the Planning Department received any comments from residents or others regarding this request. Ms. Huggins stated that she received calls from two of the nearby neighbors to Neighborhood 8. Ms. Donna Welsh at 2304 Trophy Park Drive indicated support for the project. Mr. John Coleman at 2344 indicated support for this zoning change request. Chairman Hill indicated that former mayor Nick Sanders called and spoke to the Chairman indicating his support for this request. There were no others wishing to speak and the public hearing was closed. 3 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING A REQUEST TO AMEND TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB CODE OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 3- BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION, ARTICLE XV-SWIMMING POOLS, AND CHAPTER 13-ZONING, ARTICLE V-SUPPLEMENTARY DISTRICT REGULATIONS, AFFECTING THE LOCATION OF SWIMMING POOLS. (ADM-09-005) Chairman Hill announced the case and asked for a staff report. Ms. Huggins stated that the current “swimming pool” ordinance requires that a pool be located in the rear yard. By ordinance, the definition of a rear yard is confined to the area between the principal structure and the rear lot line. In the past year, five homeowners have requested variances for the construction of their swimming pools in order to allow a portion of the pools to be in the side yard. Staff currently has three Planning and Zoning Commission Page 6 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 swimming pool variance requests pending. Staff anticipates that these requests for variances will increase in the future, especially as building in the Highlands continues. Staff requests a change to the swimming pool ordinance to allow pools to be placed in the side yard as well as the rear yard. We believe we can adhere to the intent of privacy in the 2005 ordinance by requiring that the waters edge of the swimming pools must be at least six feet from any property line. Therefore, staff requests a recommendation of approval to this change to the swimming pool ordinance. In addition, staff requests that reference to swimming pool locations be removed from Section 5.03-Accessory Structures and Uses of the Zoning Ordinance as this has created confusion in the past. By removing it from the Accessory Structures section, the swimming pool regulations will be together in Chapter 3-Buildings and Construction under Article XV-Swimming Pools. Chairman Hill noted that on page 12 of the packet there is an item concerning the water’s edge proximity to the primary dwelling which is being moved from the Accessory Structure section to the Swimming Pools section of the ordinance. Commissioner Sheridan asked for an explanation of the inconvenience imposed on a resident to obtain a variance. Ms. Huggins stated that the process begins when the homeowner or pool company submits a swimming pool permit. If the pool is not wholly located within the rear yard area, the permit is denied and the homeowner or pool contractor is informed that a variance is required. The homeowner must then submit a variance application. Advertising in the newspaper is required and all property owners within 200-ft. of the pool location must be notified of the variance request. Approximately four to six weeks passes from the time that the variance application request is received until the variance hearing takes place. If the variance request is approved, the pool permit can be issued the next day. Ms. Huggins stated that the variance application fee is $150. The homeowner must also pay for the cost of publication in the newspaper and the cost of postage for notification of the surrounding property owners. These two items add approximately $50 to the cost of the variance request for a total of approximately $200 for the variance request. Commissioner Sheridan stated that he is in favor of this request but would like to see a better definition for “not forward of the house” in H.1. He would like to see that better defined. It’s common that a pool would not be located in the front of the house and a pool cannot be located near a property line or into an easement so why let a resident build a pool all the way up to the front of the house. Pick a common line – 6-ft. back or more. Chairman Hill stated that one of the primary things to consider is that most of the variances are for lots that are odd shapes, such as cul-de-sacs. They are not rectangular lots. Planning and Zoning Commission Page 7 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 Ms. Huggins stated that it might not matter as a pool must be screened from the street [this is incorrect – the ordinance requires that pool equipment be screened from the street, not the pool itself]. Ms. Huggins stated that the pool must be fenced and the fence must be located a minimum of ten feet (10-ft.) behind the front elevation of the primary structure. Commissioner Sheridan stated that he would recommend that language be added to this ordinance to minimize confusion later on. A short discussion followed concerning Commissioner Davidson’s questions regarding wrought iron fencing. There was no further discussion and Chairman Hill called for a motion. Commissioner Sheridan made a motion recommending approval to the Town Council with the stipulation that there must be conformance to the fencing ordinance. Vice Chairman Stephens seconded the motion. Ayes: Hill, Stephens, Reed, Sheridan, Davidson Nays: None Action: 5-0, Approved 5 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2007-15 P&Z, PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 27, THE HIGHLANDS AT TROPHY CLUB, TO DELETE, ALTER, AND/OR ALLOW NEW LOT SIZE, CONFIGURATION AND AMENITIES FOR NEIGHBORHOOD 8, AN APPROXIMATELY 52.66 ACRE TRACT, AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS CHANGES TO PD-27 AS RELATED TO THIS REQUEST AS DEEMED NECESSARY. (PD-AMD-09-031) Chairman Hill announced the case and asked for a staff report. Ms. Huggins stated that there are specific details in the packet, therefore only a brief overview will be given to allow the applicant and the Commissioners discussion to get into the details of this request. Ms. Huggins stated that the applicant is requesting a change to PD-27 from a gated community of 260 town homes on 3,000 sq. ft. lots to an ungated single family community of 185 homes on 5,250 sq. ft. lots. The applicant is requesting changes to the lot coverage, minimum square footage of the homes, and setbacks. The community will no longer be private and gated. The streets will be dedicated to the Town, but the neighborhood will have a homeowners association to maintain the open spaces in the neighborhood. The applicant is requesting that the amenities of the private, gated community be removed – such as the lap pool and putting green. Planning and Zoning Commission Page 8 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 Notice of public hearing was placed in the local newspaper and property owners within 200-ft. of the neighborhood were notified. In addition, signs have been posted on the property for the past three weeks. Two private property owners adjacent or closely adjacent to this property, Ms. Welsh and Mr. Coleman, have indicated support of this request. Staff has not had any calls or written opposition to this request. As this represents a down zoning of the property from medium density to low density residential, as there has been no opposition to the request, and as some residents of Trophy Club have indicated a desire for smaller, less expensive homes to downsize to, staff recommends approval of this request. Mehrdad Moayedi, Centurion American, 1221 Highway 35E, Carrollton, Texas, thanked the Commissioners for the time and opportunity to talk about this request. He stated that it is not usual for a developer to give up density, but in this case it makes sense. He stated that he is very familiar with everyone who sits on P&Z and he appreciates how fairly he has been treated over the last three years. Mr. Sheridan is in this business and knows it well. He stated that 50-ft. lots have a perception of being tract homes, but he has 50-ft. subdivisions in University Park and Las Colinas. He stated that for Trophy Club they have asked their architectural review committee to review the plans and make sure it is a product that fits Trophy Club and is a product that P&Z would be happy and proud of. He stated that they have a great investment here, and they don’t see their money until the tail end of this thing, so they have a vested interest to make sure that this thing is a quality project. He stated that he has knocked on the door of every builder that builds a town home product. The problems they ran into are items such as master bedrooms downstairs. This is still addressed towards the active adult empty nester homeowner. The needs of that buyer, especially in Trophy Club, cannot be satisfied. He stated that they held focus groups and found that a downstairs master bedroom was desirable. Adjoining walls were disliked. HOA assessments to repair buildings were undesirable. They want to take care of their own property. They want to have a little bit of a yard. Not a huge yard. They don’t want a gated community because that drives the association prices up and that age group is pretty conscientious of their bills and what they pay on a monthly basis. Mr. Moayedi stated that it came down to needing “Villas”. Architectural features normally seen in larger lot configurations are included such as masonry requirements and cedar garage doors. He stated that it will not become a 50-ft. lot tract subdivision. He stated that as a developer he has certain requirements that he must meet. When he first came to Trophy Club, one of the things that the Council asked was that there be a certain amount of permits pulled each month. That does not in anyway justify damaging the quality of the project, but they are trying to live up to the obligations they promised Trophy Club. This property also has a PID assessment of approximately $230,000 a year that the developer pays on the land and it can’t sit here for 7 to 15 years undeveloped. It just doesn’t work. They feel they have come up with a solution that betters the property and try to do something that fits the customer base. There are approximately 60 people who have shown an interest in this product. The average price Planning and Zoning Commission Page 9 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 of a home in this subdivision will probably be $220,000 to $250,000 range. The lots are being sold for $55,000 to $55,700 each. He stated that he is actually losing money by going from 260 town home lots to 185 fifty foot lots, but it is the product that works and it is the product that people want in this part of the world. Mr. Moayedi stated that there will be a masonry fence along both Trophy Club Drive and Trophy Park Drive. Any home that backs up to a thoroughfare has a masonry wall. The homes that back up to a main thoroughfare will also have an extra 5 to 10-ft. of lot depth so there is more distance from the home to the road. The landscaping entryways will match all of the other neighborhoods of the Highlands. There will be a cart path going directly to the clubhouse for the people who desire and want to get on their golf cart to go to the clubhouse without getting in their car. They are still pursuing the active adult component. There is quite a bit of open space along the east side of the property that will be manicured and dressed up. There will be a small, private park within the neighborhood that lends itself towards the customer that they are trying to attract. Mr. Moayedi stated that they are spending money on the interior and it will be nicer or better than anything else in the Highlands. The town homes were going to be in the $150,000 to $185,000 range and he wasn’t able to establish any customer base for that product. He stated that there seems to be a base of Trophy Club residents who want to get out of a large square footage house that they don’t need anymore and down size to a smaller house. Mr. Moayedi stated that he has a buyer for this neighborhood and he would like to get this neighborhood going so he can live up to his obligations with permits and the PID assessment coming on down the road in 2010. Chairman Hill stated that this plan is for reduced density and higher valued homes than the town homes product. He asked for an explanation of the lot size. Mr. Moayedi stated that the average lot size will be 6,300 sq. ft. The minimum is 5,250 sq. ft. Sixty-eight (68) lots will be larger than 6,000 sq. ft. There are some larger than 7,000 sq. ft. Chairman Hill stated that the square footage of the homes will be a minimum of 1,600 sq. ft. up to approximately 2,500 sq. ft.? Mr. Moayedi stated that there is not a maximum, but most of the houses will be around 2,200 to 2,400 sq. ft. Chairman Hill asked for the average price point. Mr. Moayedi stated that based on the lot price they will have to be over $200,000, possibly an average of $220,000 to $250,000. Chairman Hill asked if there will be a homeowners association and if the lots adjacent to the Corps property will have wrought iron fences? Mr. Moayedi stated that the back of the lots adjacent to the open space will all be wrought iron. He stated that the Parks Department has indicated a desire to have a hook-up with the horse trail system that goes into the Corps property. The Parks Director would also like the walking trail to Planning and Zoning Commission Page 10 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 connect to city sidewalks along Neighborhood 8 so that all residents have access to the trail without going through Neighborhood 8. Mr. Moayedi stated that Neighborhood 8 will also have a private park area for Neighborhood 8 residents. One of the reasons for a homeowners association is to maintain the large amount of open space in this neighborhood. Chairman Hill asked if the gas well site is surrounded by a masonry fence. Mr. Moayedi stated that it is (as indicated in red on the Conceptual Plan) and the area surrounding the fenced gas well will be landscaped when the lots next door are developed as water is not available until the lots are developed. Chairman Hill asked for the acreage of the well site. Jaison Stephen, Jacobs Engineering, stated that it is approximately 3.5 acres. Chairman Hill asked if a number of backyards will adjoin the gas well site? Mr. Moayedi stated that they will, but there will be landscaping between the lots and the masonry wall surrounding the gas well site. Vice Chairman Stephens asked for clarification of lot size. The minimum lot size will be 1,600 sq. ft. Commissioner Reed stated that this change sounds fine to him. He believes this will be a more attractive area with this type of home. He stated that at his age he may be one of those who moves into one of them and he wouldn’t want a town home. He wants a master bedroom downstairs. Commissioner Davidson stated that he believes this is a savvy move on the developer’s part as this will improve the bottom line for the developer. He stated that from his perspective it makes sense. He doesn’t know anybody who wants a master bedroom upstairs. Commissioner Sheridan stated that he doesn’t like 50-ft. lots. He stated that all the deliberations on the PD were negative on 50-ft. lots. He agrees that “attached” products are not wanted and town homes, right now, are down significantly. Commissioner Sheridan stated that Mr. Moayedi has referred to “groups”, but he hasn’t defined that group. Trophy Club residents are young, middle and old. He asked Mr. Moayedi if he is referring to older residents downsizing? Mr. Moayedi stated that Ryland did a focus group not just of Trophy Club but also of the surrounding area and they came up with the items previously mentioned. Commissioner Sheridan stated that this, then, is not going to be for older residents only. It will be for anyone who wants to walk in and buy a house? Mr. Moayedi stated that he doesn’t believe a person with children would purchase this product. He believes they would spend a little bit more to get a 60-ft. lot product. The 50-ft. lot product is designed to attract empty-nesters, young professionals that don’t have a family and don’t want a huge yard, and elderly. Commissioner Sheridan stated that he would like to see, in writing, the lot sizes defined. He would like to see the streetscape protected as in other neighborhoods by varying the front building line or by varying the position of the garage door. With this product, the garage doors are facing the streets. Even though they are upscale doors he would like Planning and Zoning Commission Page 11 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 to see those broken up if possible. Mr. Moayedi replied that he will specify the lot sizes by percentages. He asked that they be allowed to add architectural features for garage doors by deed restriction. As previously noted, Mr. Moayedi stated that both thoroughfares will have screening walls. Commissioner Sheridan asked if there are any other outstanding issues with the Town. He asked if the Parks Department, Streets Department, etc., have signed off on the PD. Ms. Huggins responded that all departments have reviewed these changes to the PD and are satisfied with one exception. Going into tonight’s meeting, Staff wanted a clearer understanding of the landscaping and screening for Trophy Park and Trophy Club Drives as there would be homes backing up to both roads. Staff is satisfied that the applicant has addressed these issues in tonight’s meeting. Mr. Moayedi stated that he is proud that he has met his obligations to the Town. He stated that they are working very hard to keep this neighborhood successful and he can’t sit on this piece of property for seven years while hoping that a market for town homes emerges. He stated that he does have an obligation for a water tower and that there is money in escrow for that. The bid came in quite a bit higher than anticipated. The water tower isn’t needed until the third phase of the Highlands so they are waiting to bid the water tower until 2010. In the meantime, the money is in escrow and the shortfall will be made up by Centurion. Chairman Hill asked if all of the commissioners had copies of the house elevations. All did as they were included in the packet. Commissioner Sheridan had a further discussion with Mr. Moayedi regarding streetscape and garage doors. Ms. Huggins stated that the garage door architectural features required for this neighborhood are outlined on page 30 of the PD document attached to the packet. Mr. Moayedi stated that he will work hard on coming up with some architectural features and submit those to staff. He would include those items in the deed restrictions. Commissioner Sheridan asked if that could be done before this item goes to Council. Mr. Moayedi stated that he would try. Commissioner Sheridan stated that he would like to break up the garage door “look” down the street. Mr. Moayedi stated that before the Council meeting he would try to come up with items that would be part of the deed restrictions and get those to Carolyn. Commissioner Reed asked, on behalf of senior citizens, that the garage doors be kept as one unit, rather than two doors split with a column in the center. Vice Chairman Stephens stated that the only people who are going to see the garage doors are those who live in this neighborhood. There will be a screening wall along Trophy Club Drive and Trophy Park Drive so it’s almost a gated community, just without the gate. None of the streets are long in length. He doesn’t feel that the garage doors will be a problem. Mr. Moayedi stated that the doors will be cedar stained doors. He will insist on that. Planning and Zoning Commission Page 12 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 Vice Chairman Stephens stated that he did not see the garage doors as a big issue, but he likes Mr. Moayedi’s idea of looking at other ways to enhance the neighborhood. Commissioner Davidson stated that he agrees with many of Commissioner Sheridan’s comments this evening, but he also wanted to point out that the Commission has heard from people who have made it clear that they don’t want a big yard, but want something affordable, that looks nice so that they can stay in Trophy Club. If that is provided, then they won’t get too bent out of shape about the garage doors. If they don’t like it, there are other neighborhoods to choose from. This will give residents a choice. Vice Chairman Stephens added that this addresses a market issue. There is a market for what is being proposed. Two citizens were granted permission to speak by Chairman Hill. Steven Kohs, 18 Overhill Drive, thanked the Commissioners for their efforts and due diligence. He stated that he is not sure if the 50-ft. lots are an issue. He believes there are markets for all different types of lot sizes. He stated that some of the realtors that he has had an opportunity to speak to feel that 1,600 sq. ft. homes are a little small and they would like to see minimum 1,800 sq. ft. homes. He thanked Commissioner Sheridan for his due diligence and stated that he hopes Mr. Sheridan’s message is received well by the other Commissioners. Liz Maddox, 207 Fresh Meadow, stated that garage doors are a problem in some neighborhoods. She mentioned Jamie Ct. and Hanna Ct. as a neighborhood of garden or patio homes and they have cedar doors and look very nice. She hasn’t ever had a complaint about those garage doors when she has shown those properties. She stated that selling a home under 1,600 sq. ft. is very difficult unless the person is single. Older folks have kids that comes to visit, or they might want an office at home to do some work on a computer and that requires a little bit more room. She stated that a 1,600 sq. ft. home gives a very small living area and 3 small bedrooms. An 1,800 sq. ft. home would give a little bit more room if there are three bedrooms. That is a better selling product. She stated that it probably isn’t possible to do a swing-in garage on those size lots, but if there is a very nice garage door it won’t be a problem. She stated that most people in Trophy Club take a lot of pride in their houses and don’t leave their doors up all day long. She asked if there will be a charge for front yard maintenance. Mr. Moayedi stated that front yard maintenance will be the responsibility of each individual home owner. He also commented on the 1,600 sq. ft. homes. There will be a small percentage of the homes at that size. Most likely those will be custom – requested by the buyer. He stated that builders paying approximately $55,000 to $57,000 per lot do not want to build 1,600 sq. ft. houses. He stated that he is willing to put into the PD that no more than 20% will be built at 1,600 sq. ft., but he was trying to avoid that at the request of staff. Planning and Zoning Commission Page 13 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 Ms. Huggins added that staff discussed this issue with Mr. Moayedi and staff was reluctant to pursue it as it becomes a little bit of a paperwork burden on staff during plan review. However, staff is more than willing to accommodate the Commission if they desire to specify percentages of house sizes. Chairman Hill commented that eventually a point will be reached where no more small houses could be built and buyers will be pushed into a higher price range than they might want to consider. Commissioner Sheridan made a motion recommending approval of changes to PD-27 for Neighborhood 8 as outlined on the attached redlined document, subject to the following stipulations: (1) a masonry wall and landscaping along Trophy Club Drive and Trophy Park Drive to match the other Highlands neighborhoods screening walls and landscaping, and (2) define lot sizes. Vice Chairman Stephens seconded the motion. Ayes: Hill, Stephens, Reed, Sheridan, Davidson Nays: None Action: 5-0, Approved ADJOURNMENT Chairman Hill adjourned the meeting at 8:06 p.m. Planning and Zoning Commission Page 14 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262Trophy Club Entities Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:109-505-T Name: Status:Type:Agenda Item Regular Session File created:In control:11/13/2009 Planning & Zoning Commission On agenda:Final action:11/19/2009 Title:Public Hearing regarding an amendment to Planned Development District No. 13, "Village", Ordinance No. 95-20, Exhibit "C" Development Standards to delete, alter, and/or allow additional uses for Tract 2, Retail Use with Gasoline Island, an approximately 1.8 acre site. Applicant: The Dimension Group on behalf of 7-Eleven, Inc. (PD-AMD-09-032) Attachments:Staff Report.pdf Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Planning and Zoning Commission Page 15 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 109-505-T Version:File #: Title Public Hearing regarding an amendment to Planned Development District No. 13, "Village", Ordinance No. 95-20, Exhibit "C" Development Standards to delete, alter, and/or allow additional uses for Tract 2, Retail Use with Gasoline Island, an approximately 1.8 acre site. Applicant: The Dimension Group on behalf of 7-Eleven, Inc. (PD-AMD-09-032) Planning and Zoning Commission Page 16 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEMORANDUM November 19, 2009 SUBJECT: Public Hearing regarding an amendment to Planned Development District No. 13, "Village", Ordinance No. 95-20, Exhibit "C" Development Standards to delete, alter, and/or allow additional uses for Tract 2, Retail Use with Gasoline Island, an approximately 1.8 acre site. Applicant: The Dimension Group on behalf of 7-Eleven, Inc. (PD-AMD-09-032) REQUEST: 7-Eleven Corporation would like to stay open 24-hours a day and keep ice for sale in a container on the sidewalk, and store firewood in a sidewalk location for sale during the winter months. This request was advertised for a public hearing for November 19, 2009, but The Dimension Group, on behalf of 7-Eleven, Inc. asks for a withdrawal of this request at this time to give The Dimension Group additional time to prepare this item for P&Z consideration. On behalf of The Dimension Group, Staff asks for a withdrawal of the case, which will be readvertised before it is brought back to the Planning and Zoning Commission (anticipated to be January or February of 2010). (ch) Planning and Zoning Commission Page 17 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262Trophy Club Entities Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:109-506-T Name: Status:Type:Agenda Item Regular Session File created:In control:11/13/2009 Planning & Zoning Commission On agenda:Final action:11/19/2009 Title:Public Hearing to Consider an Amendment to PD-Planned Development District No. 27, Known as The Highlands at Trophy Club, Ordinance No. 2007-15 P&Z by amending Exhibit "B" - Development Standards, Section V. Neighborhood Regulations, Subsection "J" Village Center, Item 1. Permitted Uses. Applicant: Centurion Acquisitions, L.P. (PD AMD-09-030) Attachments:Staff Report.pdf Village Center Regulations from PD-27.pdf Property Owner Notification.pdf List of Property Owners within 200 ft.pdf Public Hearing Notice - Newspaper.pdf Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Planning and Zoning Commission Page 18 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 109-506-T Version:File #: Title Public Hearing to Consider an Amendment to PD-Planned Development District No. 27, Known as The Highlands at Trophy Club, Ordinance No. 2007-15 P&Z by amending Exhibit "B" - Development Standards, Section V. Neighborhood Regulations, Subsection "J" Village Center, Item 1. Permitted Uses. Applicant: Centurion Acquisitions, L.P. (PD AMD-09-030) Planning and Zoning Commission Page 19 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEMORANDUM November 19, 2009 SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Consider an Amendment to PD-Planned Development District No. 27, Known as The Highlands at Trophy Club, Ordinance No. 2007-15 P&Z by amending Exhibit "B" - Development Standards, Section V. Neighborhood Regulations, Subsection "J" Village Center, Item 1. Permitted Uses. Applicant: Centurion Acquisitions, L.P. (PD AMD-09- 030) REQUEST: To amend the “Permitted Uses” for approximately 2.703 acres of land known as Tract 1, and approximately 4.51 acres of land known as a portion of Tract 2, of “Village Center” in Planned Development No. 27 (PD-27), The Highlands at Trophy Club. Village Center consists of two tracts separated by Parkview Dr. and a portion of a (future) park (Northwest Park) that will exist between the two tracts. The smaller tract consists of approximately 2.703 acres (originally 3.3 acres, less right-of-way for the realignment of Parkview Drive) and the larger tract consists of approximately 11.561 acres (originally 13.3 acres less right-of-way and easements for streets and drainage culvert). Only 4.51 acres of the larger tract are a part of this request as the remaining portion (7.0441 acres) of the larger tract has been sold and belongs to a new owner. Planning and Zoning Commission Page 20 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 On the Survey below, the highlighted portion (approximately) represents the 4.51 acres of the larger tract that is part of this request. It is located to the west of the covered drainage easement. EXISTING CONDITION OF THE PROPERTY: Unplatted, vacant land. ADJACENT ZONING/EXISTING LAND USES: North: Byron Nelson High School and residential (Highlands Neighborhood 1) South: Future site of Northwest Park East: Parkview Drive (to the east of the smaller tract) and approximately 7 acres for development as a church site (to the east of the larger tract) West: Medlin Middle School (to the west of the smaller tract) and Northwest Park (to the west of the larger tract) Planning and Zoning Commission Page 21 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 PD-27 currently allows the following uses: Bakery Bank Barber or beauty salon Bookstores Cafes with or without patio Community Facilities to include libraries Day Care Day spa (hair salon, facial treatment, massages) Dry cleaning and laundry (pickup/drop off only) Financial institutions Florist (no outdoor storage) Furniture sales (no outside sales or display) Kindergarten Municipal facilities to include Fire, Police, and EMS Pet Services including veterinarian (without outdoor kennels) Professional and administrative offices Religious Institutions Restaurants without drive-ins Schools, Private or Public Specialty Shops The applicant requests the following use be added as a permitted use for the tracts noted above in Village Center: Restaurant with Drive-In/Through STAFF COMMENTS: This property is currently zoned PD-27 “Village Center” which allows for retail and other uses as stated above. The property is unplatted and vacant. The applicant’s request to allow a restaurant with drive-in/through is to specifically try to market the smaller 2.703 acre tract for this type of establishment. The sale of almost half the total acreage of Village Center for development as a church property has diminished the retail allure of this commercial location. The remaining tracts are small and split by a park between the properties. Staff does not believe the remaining acreage will be easily marketed but will help the developer as needed if the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of this request to the Town Council. PUBLIC HEARING: As required by ordinance, a notice of public hearing was published in the local newspaper, and property owners within 200-ft. of the properties were notified of this request. Copies of the notices are attached. Planning and Zoning Commission Page 22 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 (ch) Attachments: 1) PD-27 Village Center Permitted Uses and Regulations 2) Property Owner Notification 3) List of Property Owners within 200-ft. 4) Public Hearing Notice - Newspaper Planning and Zoning Commission Page 23 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 J. Village Center: 1. Permitted Uses: a. Bakery b. Bank c. Barber or beauty salon d. Bookstores e. Cafes with or without patio f. Community Facilities to include libraries g. Day Care h. Day spa (hair salon, facial treatment, massages) i. Dry cleaning and laundry (pickup/drop-off only) j. Financial institutions k. Florist (no outdoor storage) l. Furniture sales (no outside sales or display) m. Kindergarten n. Municipal facilities to include Fire, Police, and EMS o. Pet services including veterinarian (without outdoor kennels) p. Professional and administrative offices q. Religious Institutions r. Restaurants without drive-ins s. Schools, Private or Public t. Specialty Shops 2. Architectural and Site Design Standards: These design standards shall apply to all Permitted Uses except Day Care, Kindergarten, Schools (Private or Public), and Religious Institutions. These uses shall meet the Town of Trophy Club design requirements. 37 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 24 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 a. Building Walls and Roofs 1) An expression line shall delineate divisions between floors of all buildings, and a cornice shall delineate the tops of facades that do not utilize a pitched roof. 2) All buildings shall be designed such that no mechanical equipment (HVAC, etc.) and satellite dishes are visible from the public right-of-way or open space, whether the equipment is located on the ground, exterior walls or the roof. To screen rooftop mechanical equipment, other appurtenances, and flat or built-up roofs, all structures having a 6,000 square feet or less footprint shall be constructed with a pitched roof. Those structures having a footprint greater than 6,000 square feet shall be constructed with either a pitched or parapet roof system enclosed on all sides. 3) Mansard roofs and flat membrane-type roofs that are visible from ground level are prohibited. 4) For retail storefronts, a transom, display window area and bulkhead at the base shall be utilized. 5) Ground floor retail building plate heights should provide for at least fourteen feet (14’) in height. 6) Generally, windows shall be oriented vertically. 38 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 25 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 7) Columns and piers generally shall be spaced no farther apart than they are tall. 8) Transparency: i. Each floor of any building façade facing a park, plaza or street shall contain transparent windows covering from fifteen percent (15%) to seventy-five percent (75%) of the façade area. ii. In order to provide clear views of merchandise and to provide natural surveillance of exterior street spaces, the ground-floor along the retail storefront facade shall have transparent storefront windows covering no less than fifty percent (50%) of the façade area. iii. Entryways recessed at least four feet (4’). b. Permitted Finishes: 1) At least eighty percent (80%) of the exterior of all new buildings (excluding doors and windows) shall be finished in one or more of the following materials: i. Brick, stone, cast stone, or stucco. ii. Split face concrete block, poured-in-place concrete, and tilt-wall concrete. It is the intent that any use of concrete products shall have an integrated color and be textured or patterned. Tilt-wall concrete structures shall include reveals, punch-outs, or other similar surface characteristics to enhance the façade on at least twenty percent (20%) of each façade. iii. Side facades and rear facades shall be of finished quality and of the same color and materials that blend with the front of the building. Rear facades may be painted tilt-wall or painted block matching the same color of the rest of the building if the rear façade faces an alley or is not viewable from a public street or right-of-way. 39 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 26 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 2) To improve the pedestrian orientation, the ground floor of commercial/retail buildings shall utilize a combination of the following, unless otherwise approved by the Town: i. Corbelling, molding, string coursing, ornamentation, changes in material and color, or other sculpturing of the base; ii. Recessed windows or other techniques to distinguish the windows in the façade such as arches, pediments and mullions; and iii. Entryways recessed at least four feet (4’). 3) The utilization of repetitive storefronts for “architectural” consistency is discouraged in order to maintain an interesting street experience; although the utilization of common architectural elements shall be considered to facilitate a certain level of functional continuity. c. Building Orientation and Pedestrian Site Design: 1) Any building (excluding parking garages and other accessory buildings) viewed from a public right-of-way or public open space shall either face such right-of-way or open space, or shall have a façade facing such area in keeping with the character of the front façade, including the utilization of similar fenestration and materials. 2) Pedestrian Elements To improve the walkability and access of commercial and retail areas, the following are encouraged in the site design of a project: i. Patio/café seating areas ii. Bicycle racks iii. Continuous walkways linking stores vi. Shade provided by building orientation, canopies and/or trees vii. Decorative Trash receptacles 40 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 27 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 3) Parking Lot and Building Frontage Landscaping and Design i. A minimum of fifteen (15) square feet of landscaping including tree islands for each parking space shall be provided within the paved boundaries of the parking lot, with the landscaped areas protected by raised curbs except where wheel stops are utilized at the front of parking spaces along a landscaped median between parking bays, and pavement no closer than three feet (3’) from the trunk of trees. ii. Landscaped islands of a minimum of five feet (5’) in width and extending the entire length of the parking stall generally shall be located at the terminus of all parking rows and shall contain at least one three inch (3”) caliper tree consistent with the Tree List in Section VI – Development and Design Standards. iii. Parking spaces shall be a minimum depth of 18 feet and a minimum width of 9 feet; to encourage better shade patterns, parking bays shall be separated by a minimum five foot (5’) wide landscaped median (See illustration below), with three inch (3”) caliper shade trees planted every thirty feet and wheel stops placed so as to allow the front of vehicles to encroach over the landscaped median without hitting the trees. 41 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 28 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 iv. Foundation plantings are required for buildings or groups of buildings greater than 40,000 square feet and where the front building facade does not abut a public sidewalk, including a 3.0 inch caliper shade tree for every 10,000 square feet of gross building area consistent with the Tree List as set forth in Section VI. Small ornamental trees are permitted on a ratio of 4 to 1 instead of 3.0 inch caliper shade trees. This is intended to enhance the pedestrian experience in front of larger buildings and to break up large impervious surfaces between parking areas and the building. Foundation planting trees shall be planted within approximately 30 feet of the front façade and are required in addition to any street trees required herein. Tree grates shall be utilized for trees planted less than four (4) feet back of curb. Tree spacing shall not impede sign visibility or pedestrian safety but shall be placed so as to provide an effective shade environment in front of the building. d. Loading Areas and Trash Receptacles: 1) Loading and service areas shall be located at the side of or in the rear of buildings. Every effort should be made to reduce the need for segregated loading and service areas by ensuring that deliveries are made off-hours. Such uses as grocery stores, however, may require a loading dock area. Where tractor/semi-trailer delivery may conflict with 42 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 29 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 land uses on or adjacent to the site, then the following standards shall be followed: i. Loading and service areas shall be located at the side or rear of buildings. ii. Off-street loading areas shall be screened from view of any street public open space or adjacent property. iii. Loading areas shall be enclosed on three sides by a wall or other screening device not less than 10 feet in height. iv. Loading areas shall not be located closer than 50’ to any residential lot, unless wholly within an enclosed building. v. Screening materials shall be comprised of a wall that has a similar finish to the primary structure, or a combination of trees and shrubs that will result in solid screening within 2 years. vi. However, when adjacent to a residentially zoned district a screening wall with landscaping shall be used. 2. Trash/Recycling Receptacles: i. Commercial trash/recycling containers shall be located on the side or rear of the building and screened from public view. ii. Such containers shall be located at least 50’ away from adjacent residential property lines. iii. Such containers shall be screened on 4 sides, using an enclosure that is 7’ tall or of a height that is a minimum of 1’ above the top of the container, whichever is taller. Screening shall be comprised of brick, stone, reinforced concrete, or other similar masonry materials that have a similar finish to the primary finish; and all fence posts shall be rust- protected metal, concrete based masonry or concrete pillars. 43 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 30 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 iv. 6” concrete filled steel pipes shall be located to protect the enclosure from truck operations. v. Such container enclosures shall have steel gates and tie-backs to secure them in an open position, and fasteners to keep them closed. vi. Screening shall be maintained at all times. e. Signage 1) General: Signs shall be flat against the façade, projecting from the façade or ground monument mounted. No signs shall project above the façade unless approved as part of a site plan as a “landmark sign” such as a theater marquee or other special sign located in an prominent location and intended to provide a special character to the district and orientation to visitors. 2) Lighting: Signs shall generally be externally lit. Only individual letters and symbols may be internally lit. Neon signs shall be prohibited. 3) Finish Materials: Materials shall complement the architecture of the building, and may include wood— painted or natural; metal—copper, brass, galvanized steel; painted canvas; paint; engraving directly on façade surface; and brick or stone for monument signs. 4) Wall Signs: i. One and a half (1.5) square feet of signage is permitted for each linear foot of the primary facade of the building, excluding wing walls. (E.g. a 100’ long building façade would allow for 150 square feet of wall sign area on the building.) ii. Only one building façade with a primary entrance may be used to calculate wall signage. iii. Wall signs may be placed on any face of the building except if adjacent to a residential lot. iv. Maximum area of any single sign mounted perpendicular to a given façade shall not exceed 10 square feet unless it protrudes above the top of the facade. 44 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 31 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 v. Protruding or hanging signs shall maintain a minimum clear height of eight (8) feet above the sidewalk. 5) Monument Signs: i. Monument signs up to eight (8) feet in height are the only permanent freestanding signs allowed. ii. Maximum area of a monument sign shall be 96 square feet per sign face. Monument signs may have only two (2) sign faces. iii. If a Commercial Neighborhood extends over 1000 linear feet, then one monument sign per 500’ of frontage is permitted. (E.g. a site with 1,000’ or more of frontage may have two (2) monument signs, a site with 1,500’ or more may have three (3) signs, etc.). iv. The structure of monument signs shall be constructed of materials and colors utilized on the primary building’s façade. v. Monument signs must be spaced a minimum of two hundred fifty feet (250’) apart, unless approved otherwise at Detailed Site Plan. 6) Parking: Retail and office uses shall meet the Town’s parking standards at the time of development. 45 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 32 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Thursday, November 19, 2009 TIME OF PUBLIC HEARING: 7:00 p.m. PLACE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Svore (M.U.D.) Building – Boardroom (Council Chambers) 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262 APPLICANT: Centurion American, L.P. LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Known as “Village Center” – see diagram below. Along Bobcat Blvd. west from the intersection of Trophy Club Drive and Bobcat Blvd., to the property just west of the corner of Bobcat Blvd. and Parkview Dr. EXCEPT 7.0441 acres of the 13.3 acre tract. The 7.0441 acres are separately owned and are not a part of this request. The 7.0441 acres are located on the corner of Bobcat Blvd and Trophy Club Drive and extend south along Trophy Club Drive to the property line with Neighborhood 9 (Royal Troon). PURPOSE OF PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be conducted regarding a request for amendment to PD – Planned Development District No. 27, also known as The Highlands at Trophy Club, to amend Exhibit “B” - “Development Standards” to delete, alter, and/or allow additional “Permitted Uses” for approximately 7.2199 acres known as “Village Center”, and other miscellaneous changes to PD-27 as related to this request as deemed necessary. Applicant: Centurion Acquisitions, L.P. (PD AMD-09-030) The applicant is requesting an additional use of “Restaurant with Drive In/Through” be allowed for these tracts of land. See the following page for a list of the currently allowed uses. Planning and Zoning Commission Page 33 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 PD-27 currently allows the following uses: Bakery Bank Barber or beauty salon Bookstores Cafes with or without patio Community Facilities to include libraries Day Care Day spa (hair salon, facial treatment, massages) Dry cleaning and laundry (pickup/drop off only) Financial institutions Florist (no outdoor storage) Furniture sales (no outside sales or display) Kindergarten Municipal facilities to include Fire, Police, and EMS Pet Services including veterinarian (without outdoor kennels) Professional and administrative offices Religious Institutions Restaurants without drive-ins Schools, Private or Public Specialty Shops The applicant requests the above uses be amended to permit: Restaurant with Drive In/Through TO SURROUNDING LAND OWNERS: Property owners within 200-ft. (two hundred feet) of this property receive written notification of this request. All interested property owners are encouraged to attend this hearing to let the Planning and Zoning Commission and/or Town Council know whether or not you support this request. Persons wishing their opinion to be part of the record, but are unable to attend may send a written reply prior to the date of the hearing by email to chuggins@ci.trophyclub.tx.us, or by mail to: Town of Trophy Club, Attn: Carolyn Huggins, Planning & Zoning Department, 100 Municipal Drive, Trophy Club, Texas 76262. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Please contact Carolyn Huggins, Planning & Zoning Manager at 682-831-4681 or chuggins@ci.trophyclub.tx.us The Town Council will hear this request on Monday, December 7, 2009 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 100 Municipal Drive, Trophy Club, Texas 76262. Planning and Zoning Commission Page 34 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 BDMR Development LLC 3901 Airport Freeway, Suite 200 Bedford, TX 76021-6117 Drees Custom Homes LP 6225 N. State Hwy 161, Suite 400 Irving, TX 75038-2225 High Trophy Development LP 1221 N. Interstate 35E #200 Carrollton, TX 75006-3806 Northwest I.S.D. P.O. Box 77070 Ft. Worth, TX 76177-0070 Centex Homes 1603 LBJ Fwy, Suite 600 Dallas, TX 75234 Lennar Homes of Texas 1707 Market Place, Suite 270 Irving, TX 75063 First Texas Homes 2221 E. Lamar Street, Suite 960 Arlington, TX 76006-7419 Jesus Monroy 2423 Lilyfield Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Faye & James Jaraczewski 2417 Lilyfield Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, 12th Floor 50 East North Temple Street Salt Lake City, UT 84150 Michael & Susan Fitzgerald 2421 Lilyfield Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Keith & Melissa Killebrew 2520 Roseville Dr. Trophy Club, TX 76262 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 35 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 Town of Trophy Club Department of Planning & Zoning 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262 TO: Alliance Regional Newspapers / Classifieds Dept. DATE: November 2, 2009 FROM: Carolyn Huggins PAGES: 1 RUN DATE: 1 Time: Wednesday, November 4, 2009 SUBJECT: Public Hearing NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Thursday, November 19, 2009 TOWN COUNCIL Monday, December 7, 2009 A Public Hearing will be held by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Trophy Club in the Boardroom of the Municipal Utility District Building, 100 Municipal Drive, at 7:00 p.m., Thursday, November 19, 2009, to consider: Amending Ordinance No. 2007-15 P&Z, PD Planned Development District No. 27, The Highlands at Trophy Club, to amend Exhibit “B” Development Standards to delete, alter, and/or allow additional “Permitted Uses” for approximately 7.2199 acres known as “Village Center”, and other miscellaneous changes to PD-27 as related to this request as deemed necessary. This request does not include 7.0441 acres of Village Center owned separately by a church. The Town Council will hear the above item on December 7, 2009, in the Boardroom of the Municipal Utility District Building, 100 Municipal Drive, at 7:00 p.m. Planning and Zoning Commission Page 36 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 100 Municipal Drive Trophy Club, Texas 76262Trophy Club Entities Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:109-507-T Name: Status:Type:Agenda Item Regular Session File created:In control:11/13/2009 Planning & Zoning Commission On agenda:Final action:11/19/2009 Title:Discussion and Recommendation regarding a request from Centurion Acquisitions, L.P. to amend Planned Development No. 27, Ordinance No. 2007-15 P&Z, Exhibit B "Development Standards", Section V. Neighborhood Regulations, Subsection "J" Village Center, Item 1. Permitted Uses. (PD-AMD-09-030) Attachments: Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Planning and Zoning Commission Page 37 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009 109-507-T Version:File #: Title Discussion and Recommendation regarding a request from Centurion Acquisitions, L.P. to amend Planned Development No. 27, Ordinance No. 2007-15 P&Z, Exhibit B "Development Standards", Section V. Neighborhood Regulations, Subsection "J" Village Center, Item 1. Permitted Uses. (PD-AMD-09-030) Planning and Zoning Commission Page 38 of 38 Meeting Date: November 19, 2009