Agenda Packet P&Z 03/06/2008 - CANCELLEDTown of Trophy Club
Planning & Zoning Commission Regular Session Agenda
100 Municipal Drive
Trophy Club, Texas 76262
Thursday, March 6, 2008
7:00 P.M.
Call to order and announce a auorum.
Review and approve minutes of the February 21, 2008 Planning and Zoning
Commission meetina.
Discuss and Take Appropriate Action on Appeal of Value Place Hotel East
Elevation Signage.
Adjournment.
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008 Page 1 of 24
From:
(ch)
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM
The Office of the Planning and Zoning Coordinator
Subject: Agenda Item No.A.1
Call to order and announce a quorum.
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008
Date: 3-6-2008
Page 2 of 24
From:
(ch)
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM
The Office of the Planning and Zoning Coordinator
Subject: Agenda Item No.B.I
Date: 3-6-2008
Review and approve minutes of the February 21, 2008 Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting.
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008
Page 3 of 24
MINUTES OF A REGULAR SESSION
FOR THE
TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 21, 2008
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas met in a
Regular Session on February 21, 2008, at 7:00 p.m. in the Conference Room of the
Public Services Building, 100 Municipal Drive, Trophy Club, Texas 76262.
COMMISSIONERS ATTENDANCE:
Chairman Hill
Present
Vice Chairman Stephens
Present
Commissioner Reed
Present
Commissioner Ashby
Present
Commissioner Sheridan
Present
Commissioner Sanchez
Present
Commissioner Forest
Present
STAFF AND GUESTS PRESENT:
Carolyn Huggins Planning & Zoning Coordinator
Larry Stewart Owner, PD -25 Property
Brian Dench Pate Engineers
A.1 CALL TO ORDER AND ANNOUNCE A QUORUM.
Chairman Hill called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. with seven members present.
B.1 REVIEW AND APPROVE MINUTES.
a. January 3, 2008.
b. February 15, 2007.
c. March 1, 2007.
Vice Chairman Stephens motioned to approve the minutes of the January 3, 2008,
Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner
Sheridan.
Ayes: Hill, Stephens, Reed, Forest, Sheridan
Nays: None
Abstain: Ashby and Sanchez, who were absent January 3, 2008.
Action: 5-0-2, Approved
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008 Page 4 of 24
Vice Chairman Stephens motioned to approve the minutes of the February 15, 2007,
Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner
Sheridan.
Ayes: Hill, Ashby, Reed, Sheridan
Nays: None
Abstain: Stephens, who was absent February 15, 2007 and Sanchez and Forest, who
were not yet members of this Board on February 15, 2007.
Action: 4-0-3, Approved
Vice Chairman Stephens motioned to approve the minutes of the March 1, 2007,
Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner
Reed.
Ayes: Hill, Stephens, Reed, Sheridan
Nays: None
Abstain: Ashby, who was absent March 1, 2007 and Sanchez and Forest, who were
not yet members of this Board on March 1, 2007.
Action: 4-0-3, Approved
CA DISCUSSION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATIVE TO A REQUEST FOR
A TEMPORARY USE COMMUNITY GARAGE SALE PERMIT GRANTED BY
SPECIAL PRIVILEGE. (APPLICANT: TROPHY CLUB WOMEN'S CLUB).
Commissioner Reed made a motion recommending that the Town Council approve the
request for a temporary use Community Garage Sale Permit for April 19, 2008 and
October 4, 2008. Vice Chairman Stephens seconded the motion.
Ayes: Hill, Stephens, Reed, Ashby, Forest, Sanchez, Sheridan
Nays: None
Action: 7-0, Approved
C.2 DISCUSS AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION RELATIVE TO A REQUEST
FOR REPLAT OF LOT 3, BLOCK A, TROPHY WOOD BUSINESS CENTER.
APPLICANT: HIGHWAY 114 PROSPECT, LTD (RP -08-013).
Chairman Hill gave opening remarks, reviewed the staff report and explained to the
residents present what a plat is and how plat approval takes place:
Due to the nature of the questions and concerns recently expressed by numerous
residents relative to this application for replat of Lot 3, Block A, Trophy Wood Business
Center, it appears that some residents have some confusion about the platting process.
• What is a Plat?
o A "plat" is a document filed at the County Courthouse that outlines the
boundaries (the legal description) of a piece of property. Tracts 6 & 7 are
currently platted as one lot, rather than two lots. The plat must match the
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008 Page 5 of 24
PD (Planned Development No. 25) requirements, thus the request for
"replat" so that the two documents (plat and PD) will match. The
dimensions of each tract will not change. The zoning and uses of each
tract will not change.
• Why were residents within 200 feet not notified of the Replat request of Lot 3,
Block A, Trophy Wood Business Center?
o Residential replats require publication in the town newspaper and written
notice to the owners of property in the original subdivision. Those steps
are not required for commercial replats.
• Does a Replat mean that the dimensions are being changed?
o PD -25 lists the size of Tract 6 as approximately 1.0 acres of land. Tract 7
is listed as approximately 1.8 acres of land.
o The replat presented by the applicant shows Tract 6 as 0.938 acres and
Tract 7 as 2.024 acres. The total acreage for the two tracts is unchanged
at 2.962 acres. Those acreages are close enough to fall within acceptable
planning practices.
• Does a Replat mean that the current zoning or uses of Lot 3R2 will be changed?
o No. Zoning requests involve changing the "use" of a property whereas
" lap ttinq" a property does not change or alter the "use". To "plat" means
that a written document is created showing the boundaries of the property
for the purpose of filing a permanent record of that property at the County
Courthouse. The plat is created by a registered public surveyor
(Registered Professional Land Surveyor for the State of Texas) who takes
an actual survey on the ground of the lot corners, angles and points of
curve and notes those on the "plat" document that must be reviewed by
the Planning & Zoning Commission and approved by the Town Council.
The plat is then filed in Denton County as a permanent legal description of
that property.
Chairman Hill asked the applicant to explain the purpose of the replat. Brian Dench,
Engineer for the project, explained that the purpose of the replat is to add an interior lot
line to create two lots.
Chairman Hill then continued with his introduction: As to the actions that the Planning
and Zoning Commission may take this evening, we must consider the developer's
application and base our recommendation to the Town Council on laws of the State of
Texas. Plat approval is regulated by Chapter 212 of the Texas Local Government
Code. Specifically, §212.005 states that the municipal authority responsible for
approving a plat must approve a plat or replat that satisfies all applicable regulations."
The applicable regulations for review by the Planning and Zoning Commission and
Town Council are found in the Town's Subdivision Regulations. Section 3.05 of the
Town's Subdivision Regulations provide the following criteria for plat approval:
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008 Page 6 of 24
"A. The Town shall approve a plat if it conforms to:
1. The general plan, rules and ordinances of the Town and its current and
future streets, alleys, parks, playgrounds, and public utility facilities;
2. The general plan, rules and ordinances for the extension of the Town
and its roads, streets, and public highways within the Town and in its
extraterritorial jurisdiction, taking into account access to the extension of sewer
and water mains and the instrumentalities of public utilities:
3. All requirements of the Town's Subdivision Regulations and all rules
adopted pursuant to those Regulations of the Town's Zoning Ordinance.
4. An approved preliminary plat.
If the Commission finds tonight that the requirements of the Town's Subdivision
Regulations applicable to the pending replat application have been met, then the
P&Z must approve the replat and does not have the discretion to deny the
pending replat. If the P&Z determines that compliance with one or more of the
applicable regulations have not been attained, then the Commission will need to
specifically identify those subdivision regulations for which there is a deficiency
so that the applicant can remedy that deficiency.
To the extent that some of the residents attending this meeting may believe that
a denial of the replat is a means to affect the use for which the property has
already been zoned pursuant to PD No. 25, it should be clear that the scope of
the Commission's authority and the Commission's discretion relative to the
proposed replat is limited. If the replat failed to meet the requirements of the
Town's subdivision regulations, and the replat were to be denied, that denial
would affect only the platting of the property and the hotel use for which the
property is currently zoned would continue to exist.
Chairman Hill called on the Commissioners for comments and questions.
Vice Chairman Stephens stated that his assumption is that this request, having been
reviewed by the Town Engineer and the Planning & Zoning Coordinator, does comply
with the ordinances and regulations and therefore he has no questions.
Commissioner Reed stated that he has no questions as this corrects what exists
already in the PD.
Commissioner Ashby is concerned about the usage of the lot that will be less than one
acre.
Commissioner Forest and Sanchez did not have any questions or comments.
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008 Page 7 of 24
Commissioner Sheridan also has a concern regarding the use of the less than one acre
lot. He would like to see an internal building line on the plat. Regarding the 30 -ft. buffer
easement, he noted that the PD uses the word "yard" rather than "buffer". He would like
to see that changed as he wishes to only see green space in the 30 -ft. buffer. His
biggest concern is that Lot 3R2 (Tract 6) doesn't have enough room for a building along
with a fire lane, dumpster, cars, etc. He stated that why he will vote against this is that
Tract 3R2 per zoning is supposed to be one acre and the applicant is bringing forward a
replat with a 6% change in the size of the tract to .938 acres which puts the property line
approximately 8 -ft. over in compliance with the zoning ordinance. He feels that is
substantial.
Larry Stewart, Developer, showed a concept plan of a one-story building for Tract 3R2.
He stated that when PD -25 was originally approved they didn't have a crystal ball to
know exactly where the lot line needed to be. They put in "approximately" to designate
acreage rather than binding it to a specific amount.
Commissioner Sheridan replied that approximately is a subjective viewpoint and he
feels that 6% or 8 -ft. is more than "approximately".
Mr. Stewart responded that from a design standpoint 8 -ft. isn't much of a difference. He
stated that they are trying for a "highest and best use" and an office pad will be placed
on Tract 6, 4,500 to 5,000 sq. ft., possibly a medical person or possibly just a general
office, but that tract was designated as office from the get -go.
Commissioner Sheridan stated that he likes that there isn't any concrete on the buffer
zone.
Mr. Stewart stated that he has the same point of view about "yard". He contemplates
something green with grass in it; it will be a landscaped area.
Chairman Hill stated that in his opinion their lot sizes are a good approximation of the
values in the PD.
Commissioner Reed made a motion to recommend approval of the replat of Lot 3R1 &
3R2, Block A, Trophy Wood Business Center. The motion was seconded by Vice
Chairman Stephens.
Ayes: Hill, Stephens, Reed, Forest, Sanchez
Nays: Sheridan, Ashby
Action: 5-2, Approved
D.1 ADJOURNMENT.
Chairman Hill adjourned the meeting at 7:38 p.m.
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008 Page 8 of 24
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM
From: The Office of the Planning and Zoning Coordinator Date: 3-6-2008
Subject: Agenda Item No.C.I
Discuss and Take Appropriate Action on Appeal of Value Place Hotel East
Elevation Signage.
SUMMARY: On January 21, 2008, the Town Council voted to deny approval of the
east elevation signage at Value Place Hotel, 306 Trophy Branch. On January 24, 2008,
a letter was sent to the owner of the hotel, Quanah Properties, LP requesting removal of
the east elevation signage within 15 business days of receipt of the letter.
On February 4, 2008, a letter was received from Arthur Selander, Attorney, on behalf of
Quanah Properties, LP requesting an appeal of the decision that the sign must be
removed. Mr. Selander or a representative from Quanah Properties, LP will present
their appeal to the Planning and Zoning Commission on March 6, 2008.
BACKGROUND: On October 2, 2006, the Town Council approved Ordinance 2006-39
which amended Ordinance 2002-41 P&Z, known as PD Planned Development District
No. 25, Trophy Wood Business Center, by adding Sign Criteria for the Value Place
Hotel. The sign criteria included approval for four signs:
1) A monument sign structure on the south side of the hotel along State Highway 114.
2) A wall sign on the south wall of the hotel, facing State Highway 114, with an Optec
LED Electronic Message Center.
3) A wall sign on the west wall of the hotel.
4) A Wall sign on the east wall of the hotel.
On February 26, 2007, the owner of the hotel, Quanah Properties, LP requested a
revision to the rear elevation signage (east wall). This change was administratively
approved by Staff.
In October 2007, the Town Council requested that the Planning and Zoning
Commission review the east elevation signage and recommend to the Town Council
approval or denial.
On January 3, 2008, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the signage and by
a vote of 4-1 recommended approval to the Town Council.
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008 Page 9 of 24
Attachments: January 24, 2008 Letter to Quanah Properties, LP
February 4, 2008 Letter from Quanah Properties, LP Requesting Appeal
Excerpt from January 3, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
Sign Criteria Approved by Town Council on October 2, 2006
Rear Elevation Sign Revision Approved by Staff on February 26, 2007
Ordinance No. 2006-39
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008 Page 10 of 24
TOWN OF
TROPHY CLUB
January 24, 2008
Mr. Roger Unger
V.P. Real ,Estate Development
Quanah Properties, LP
16610 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1340
Dallas, TX 75248
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL
RE: VALUE PLACE HOTEL EAST ELEVATION SIGNAGE
!Dear Roger,
On January 21, 2008, the Trophy Club Town Council denied approval of the east
elevation signage for Value Place Hotel located at 306 Trophy Branch. The Council
found that the sign is not in compliance with the Town Sign Regulations, Chapter 5.
Article IV, Section 4.06, which allows only one programmed electronic display per
premise, nor is it in compliance with the Value Place Hotel sign criteria approved by the
Town Council on October 2, 2006, Planned Development No. 25, Ordinance No. 2006-
39, Exhibit 5.6.
The east elevation sign must be removed within fifteen (15) business days of receipt of
this notice. A code enforcement officer will inspect the property on the l6`' dny
following receipt of this notice. If the sign has not been removed, you will be subject to a
fine up to $2,000.00_
Once the existing east elevation signage is removed, you may apply for a sign permit to
install the sign approved by the Town Council on October 2, 2006.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
CD1,yk_q�
Carolyn Huggins
Planning & Zoning Coordinator
cc: Daviel Johnston
Brandon Emmons
Patricia Adams
1017 M—kipal Dni e Traphy Club, Tat as 76262 Tele (682) 831-900 Fair (817) 491-93I2
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008 Page 11 of 24
rW_4
,rA' SC
L
Arthur R Selander WILLING • SELANDER - CUMMiSKEY • LOMDS
February 4, 2008
VIA CMRRR AW FACSIMILE TO 817-491-9312
Carolyn Huggins
Planning and Zoning Coordinator
Town of Trophy Club
100 Municipal Drive
Trophy Club, TX 76262
Re: Value place Hotel East Elevation Signage
Dear Ms. Huggins:
E-mail: asetandar@gsclpc.ccm
The above-named law firm represents Quanah Properties, LP ("Quanah") in
connection with the above -referenced matter. Your January 24, 2008 letter to Quanah
requesting removal of the Value Place Hotel l=ast Elevation Signage was received by
Quanah on January 25, 2008.
The Value Place Hotel East Elevation Signage was erected pursuant to a specific
permit issued by the Town of Trophy Club on June 25, 2007. Accordingly, Quanah
construes your January 24, 2008 letter as an attempted revocation of that permit under the
terms of Town Sign Regulations, Chapter 5, Article IV, Section 4.02. Quanah hereby
notifies the Town of Trophy Club that it is exercising its rights of appeal in accordance with
Town Sign Regulations, Chapter 5, Article IV, Section 4.02(A)(2)(e).
By exercising its administrative appellate rights, Quanah does not waive its rights
to institute litigation at any time against the Town of Trophy Club in connection with its
attempted revocation of the permit forme Value Place Hotel East Elevation Signage and
to seek all legal and equitable relief to which it may be entitled.
Yo r 'tru y
`Je�:
A r F. elander
AFS/tl p
CC' Patricia Adams (via facsimile to 817-491-9312 and CMRRR)
Bryan Tower 2001 Bryan St., Suite 1800 Pallas, T% 75201 ph. 214.871.2100fx. 214.87,.2111 www.gselpc.com
A P R 0 F E S S 1 0 N A L C 0 R P 0 R A T 1 0 N A T T O R N E Y S A N D C 0 U N 5 E L 0 R S
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008 Page 12 of 24
EXCERPT FROM JANUARY 3, 2008
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
E.1 PUBLIC HEARING TO REVIEW VALUE PLACE HOTEL EAST ELEVATION
SIGNAGE.
Commissioner Reed motioned to open the public hearing. The motion was seconded
by Vice Chairman Stephens and approved by all members present.
Mark Collins, 13 Jamie Ct., thanked the Commissioners for the opportunity to speak to
them and stated that he is glad they are considering the signage that the Value Place
Hotel has. He stated that he moved to Trophy Club about two and a half years ago. He
hired a single person from Ohio, who asked him about buying a home in Trophy Club;
he told her it is a real nice community. She ended up buying a house in Trophy Club
last January and the other day when they were talking about some of the issues going
on with the development plans for the area near Value Place she said that if she had
driven up here and seen Value Place she would not have bought a house in this
community. Mr. Collins stated that the signage they have now looks more like Las
Vegas than what is on the website for the Town, which is a nice residential lake
community. Mr. Collins stated that if there is anything that can be done about this, he
appreciates the Commission's effort in working in that direction.
There were no others speakers and the Chairman called for a motion to close the public
hearing.
Commissioner Reed made a motion to close the Public Hearing. The motion was
seconded by Vice Chairman Stephens and approved by all members present.
The Chairman moved to Item F.1 for discussion and consideration of this matter.
F.1 DISCUSS AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ON REVIEW OF VALUE
PLACE HOTEL EAST ELEVATION SIGNAGE.
Chairman Hill stated the following: "Before the Commission further considers the
agenda item before us, I want to provide some basic points of information to guide our
discussion:
• Development of the Value Place Hotel took place under criteria set forth in
Planned Development Ordinance 2006-39, approved by the Town Council
October 2, 2006.
• The property is currently in full compliance with PD 2006-39.
• Copies of the sign criteria that were attached to the original PD Ordinance 2006-
39 were included in the P&Z packet for tonight's meeting.
• As the Public Hearing agenda item was specific to the Town Council's request to
review the east elevation signage of the Value Place Hotel, the Commission can
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008 Page 13 of 24
consider only this sign at this time. No other parts of PD 2006-39 are to be
discussed in this meeting.
The question is, `Should the sign be allowed under the present circumstances."'
Chairman Hill asked the Commissioners for discussion and comment.
Commissioner Reed: "I don't understand all the fuss about this. We have electronic
signs for the Town. I don't see anything wrong with an electronic sign for a business
establishment. The two signs they have face Highway 114. The only people who see
them are the people who go up and down the highway. That is exactly the people that
the hotel is trying to get the word to that they have a place for people to stay on a long
term basis. Value Place is a reputable firm. They have hotels like this all around the
country. They serve a very special purpose for people here for conferences; to visit sick
family members in the hospital; instead of going out and paying $100 a night for a hotel
this is a perfect thing for people in that situation. Maybe some of you like to stay in a
$100 hotel all the time, but some people can't do that. I see nothing wrong with the sign
whatsoever. I see nothing wrong with the hotel. If it were next to somebody's house
with a flashing sign that flashed in your bedroom, I could understand it, but nobody any
place in town can see it unless they are out on the highway. I strongly recommend;
am in favor of leaving it just the way it is. They are in full compliance. All of these
things were approved by the Town and I see no reason that we should change it now."
Vice Chairman Stephens: "Chairman Hill, I think it is a little late to be discussing this.
They met our Town ordinances and they have a right to put signs up and seek
business. I don't have a problem with it. That's commercial property. It is one of the 86
uses allowed on that property. They built it according to our Town codes. They signed
it according to our Town ordinances. I don't have a problem with it at this point, nor did I
have a problem with it when they made application."
Commissioner Sheridan: "The sign in question does not meet the ordinance so the idea
that it is in complete compliance with the ordinance I don't think is quite there, because
this sign in question was not part of the original approved signage for this PD. I've been
trying to figure out if I would have approved it back then. I think I would have. I don't
like to think that [that I would have approved it] because I don't like the sign, but at the
same time I think that I probably would not have objected to it at the time. The fact is,
though, that the sign is not in compliance with the PD. It is an improper sign."
Commissioner Forest: "I was under the impression that it was approved; that it is in
compliance with the ordinance. In fact, I wondered why it was even brought up because
if it is in compliance how are we going to turn it down or even object to it anyway. If
they met the Town ordinance on it, to me it is not necessary to even bring it up. There
isn't anything we can do about it anyway. It is not up to us. It is a recommendation to
start with to the Town Council, but if it is in compliance I can't see that it makes any
difference. If it isn't in compliance then that is a different issue."
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008 Page 14 of 24
Commissioner Sheridan: "That begs the question, is it or isn't it in compliance with the
ordinance."
Chairman Hill: "The sign was installed with a sign permit from the Town which was
issued after February 26, 2007, and they installed the sign on the basis of having a
permit from the Town which, in fact, said that it was in compliance. That is where we
stand."
Chairman Hill asked for further discussion or a motion.
Commissioner Reed made a motion recommending that the Town Council approve the
signs as they exist now. Vice Chairman Stephens seconded the motion.
Ayes: Hill, Stephens, Reed, Forest
Nays: Sheridan
Action: 4-1, Approved
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008 Page 15 of 24
rjFEDERAL
Y HEATH
- � •mom :.'n .an.
• -T25-- - -aZa G¢i.� mn+��iu w o�w�P
_----_ ' ___ _______-Y ,ywh,sv.W�em
-------------- ____ __ _____
iNNANNFETIWCNRE �`r'+1++ ..®„.. OEEWALLACE
,�.,....„ WAYNE RAZOR
t� �.�.. _ PEiER CAROiNAL
Ask
` !
1
`,\, ` �' ('.iiINEl iixu6ruxr
SIS PLAN - V6 I- PI� HOTEL - 121 57JO'.05
TKUPKY GL1.5, YE.KAS
SCALE: °h• 0 9'�C'
Lxf CRUi16 S91'inP AFFPueu. CJ@ILIi ROIIfD WIl€]R.
£F CEDi1W CNi1CdFFP 00ii0Y PEixP)!i ild RE1�€n"a YRE RYM1Pf
RA &A6,(.
9rnwroe i n 7
may, Poo -owl
F1Y
#100 GROUND SIGN CABINET STRUCTURE
FEDERAL
A&
,mevCUMM
AFMe 1ROPWY PAll�, T%
E-20.2005
>axe•x.xx P a 7_
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008 Page 16 of 24
SCALE: °h• 0 9'�C'
Lxf CRUi16 S91'inP AFFPueu. CJ@ILIi ROIIfD WIl€]R.
£F CEDi1W CNi1CdFFP 00ii0Y PEixP)!i ild RE1�€n"a YRE RYM1Pf
RA &A6,(.
TD PW11 ��u`"'"
Gen sgft =72
4
/. MU"IswMowo,xw w
GUIDO M SLWM LEi1EF5 UE pw"T90m
YELIOwC PW11C1 BACK M�
5. 3iEa SUPMRfi PC1F CULR PAPIlEO 544ER NFTNLC.
FEDERAL
A&
,mevCUMM
AFMe 1ROPWY PAll�, T%
E-20.2005
>axe•x.xx P a 7_
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008 Page 16 of 24
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008 Page 17 of 24
ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS
FEDERAL
HEATH
1.20 APAP CIRCUIT DEDICATED
— �^—
STUBBED OUT IN THE MIDDL
OF THE SIGN.
FINAL HOOK UP BY SIGN INSTALLERS
E®EYaw
Tv -d•
sPECIEIrnnBxs:
^�•„y ��"'�*
ir
4T.
STRUCTURE IB TO BE I"MILLIKEN TUBING STAPLE SYSTEM.
Y
Pr
THE FACE 1E ARLON WF BACNGRGUNU
W/ ARLON VINYLS APPLI€D.
THE BACK 189AHITE OPADUE BANNER FABRIC
THE SIM ARE SKINNED W!
PRE FINISHED -Nfi BLACK ALUM. INO RETAINERS)
7
.R
E. INTERNALLY ADILLUMINATED BY ARD LAMPS;
ONE 1B'$PREAD DOUBLE TOWARD THE BOTTOM
AND ONE N' SPREAD DOUBLE TO LIGHT UP THE
WORD -CALL.
DEE WALLACE
THE RED AND WHITE PORTION OF THE FACE WILL
! A
BE COMPLETELYOPAOUE AT HiGHT.+yF,:w..f.
WAYXE RASOR
3. ALL COPY IS ARLON Af2S TRANSLUCENT YELLOW.
2nnt—PETER
BACK OPAQUE VINYL INAINE ON "VALUE PLACE".
WHITE. BLACK 5 RED (ARLON #2291 AREAS TO BE
OPADUE VINYL APPLICATION.
6. {11I2- X2- ANOLE CUPS FOR MOUNTING.
,IIOPIII' pL'R. iK
#125 WALL SIGN CABINET STRUCTURE (FLEX FACE 2 f Geo Sqtt =94.7
--0
dsALE x ., D
Sia,gip
ENr d-E4�B6
NwYa d a 7
c—K— now
FEDERAL
FtEATN
F
7`"+�•-�{
II 1. ALUMNAPANTED HANNEX VRiH
LUM AT
_-_ 1. Id..MIM
KOM: A CHANNEL
Y - 1d••GEMII®IIN IBtlRGERNACNANNEL
r � cNAlra iDLININYI"IIkTENOR.E%TERMIR
�.y�-o�vu�••an
PA xI€Q Fucx.
1
E. AWMIIIUMCENFERCI,RINET: R41NiW iq MATCH
TRTN 4UmN CLEAR Alp NEIN SHIUER
NCNRIYIEI.
ON ON FACENI.
CRININ€LOMATC dM INRRIQR.TYTFRIRR
_
-180 ED.
TRIER TO ZION OFC1S-EAU REQ.
]. CENSER SCCTIQX QE GAIN PANTED AILYAR YEHAW C
.iE
•7
r.PTmE
IG m
INTO LUIN TSCTION.INIC MF%SAGf INRINSTILLED
INTO
R .WE I Ace- LOWER`YINWE PLA N.4 CARNET.
A. CANIXEi FACES NXQ FNLENPNKHO-TtHS.AR WTIH:
UPNI MY.DTOMA.
a.4-
j
PEEPLIH;R:
I.I'pFEP IA"YEAERETLIIIYA PNMEEP TO YRigH
STUNS
DEE WALLACE
INTEM,Rgass r.M. C.
D. Ally ILW M. WON SINGLE STROKE tLFA0. OgLQ
E7
1SR�VALUE PLA CE
MEN.
MEN.
ILiLYBLETU MATH SINGLE STRIAE CLEAR
'."+""�"� WA17iE RA5UR
.
CC,Q MEN "No "tSIOE IF l"S.
-R-IE®1-1. MM4 u 111-1. V MIL IYERux
ar,w._ PETERCARDINAL
A. IPEnUMINUM AAUCAYRF:
A. 4-C
A. 4- CUP NINE RN&INER. pYO YRigH PME-Iy
wrer�m:
SIGN RPF 1x0
CAP
RED � NTEIII REP TNN CAP RFiAINEB
TRANSLUCENTNYIIRE MALIY:WITN
A. FUR ARE 11 MNTL QYERUY.
Nig N RRDU
NYINI 1!136
PITCH t5ne �
C. IMIENNALL
YRLLY ILIDWNRTEI NAM 15mm CLEAR REQ MEN.
LEDY—L 2Si0PGA
CAZIVI(t t4 O.N-A I'•r
AC110Y0UTAR
TAAPNE QJL TX
CIRCUITS MH LER }Fp AAy
CIRCUIT CREAMERS NEReO EA IFgkIdEFN
TUTA:I CH—SFnN 2.MlW
rG1
�r
APPROA "WEIGHT -1100 N
nA. .>O it C:li
g i
R
16Ynes
IrN` tItllIH 6N.TA
#200 WALL SIGN CABINET STRUCTURE
Gen sgit =138.64
SCALE: 'h'=I'T
1 a 7
ANfy�•Intr
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008 Page 17 of 24
7 r
b� B Nin
_� Vq: '•N
+�
-�
v6!# 49 Lot •0 1�. V'. st
IV o!:oi!oil >E
.
o
•_
lot
t
AI FR[INI FAIL �N _
_
7 r
b� B Nin
_� Vq: '•N
NOTE•
WALL BRACING IS THE
RESPONSIBILITY Of
VALUE PLACE
___vSECTIDN DETAIL END ELEVATION INTERIOR LIT SIGN
�J FEDERAL
�7HEATH
Nary w+w Krry MlnMa
.� CEEWALIACE
WMR"
PEM CAESM
TROPNI'S41R. Tlf
Kvw4r
aw�.w
1.OP111!Cil■.lA
1.34MI8
Vwxwnnec b d
«,_ posim
FEDERAL
HEATH
•19lltie4i +wilMryel6�w
nrors�• CEEWA.EACE
..�rWr Ih11fliF RAECR
w. PEMCAFAWK
ryare��
,•twer w.•� ac
nlwxrtur.n
F�
�w� • a i
«rte. "law
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008 Page 18 of 24
+�
•
'v
`� `•• C
I1 10■_Of
'G •
o
NOTE•
WALL BRACING IS THE
RESPONSIBILITY Of
VALUE PLACE
___vSECTIDN DETAIL END ELEVATION INTERIOR LIT SIGN
�J FEDERAL
�7HEATH
Nary w+w Krry MlnMa
.� CEEWALIACE
WMR"
PEM CAESM
TROPNI'S41R. Tlf
Kvw4r
aw�.w
1.OP111!Cil■.lA
1.34MI8
Vwxwnnec b d
«,_ posim
FEDERAL
HEATH
•19lltie4i +wilMryel6�w
nrors�• CEEWA.EACE
..�rWr Ih11fliF RAECR
w. PEMCAFAWK
ryare��
,•twer w.•� ac
nlwxrtur.n
F�
�w� • a i
«rte. "law
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008 Page 18 of 24
•_
lot
t
;•
_
9 ice::
•
SCALE
NOTE•
WALL BRACING IS THE
RESPONSIBILITY Of
VALUE PLACE
___vSECTIDN DETAIL END ELEVATION INTERIOR LIT SIGN
�J FEDERAL
�7HEATH
Nary w+w Krry MlnMa
.� CEEWALIACE
WMR"
PEM CAESM
TROPNI'S41R. Tlf
Kvw4r
aw�.w
1.OP111!Cil■.lA
1.34MI8
Vwxwnnec b d
«,_ posim
FEDERAL
HEATH
•19lltie4i +wilMryel6�w
nrors�• CEEWA.EACE
..�rWr Ih11fliF RAECR
w. PEMCAFAWK
ryare��
,•twer w.•� ac
nlwxrtur.n
F�
�w� • a i
«rte. "law
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008 Page 18 of 24
NOTE;
WALL BRACING IS THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF
VALUE PLACE
---OSECTION DETAIL END ELEVATION INTERIOR LIT SIGN
p
I�FEDERAL
■7 NEATN
-1.
nean�rav_gs_xa�.s __.
_ ., r�Ea�ulawa
mcnrr cwo, a
qP
IIflWlllllllllllillllllll�l`IIIII ' a Il
/l , ��15Ed BAG�F,J,,,F�IA71[?N - Valua Place +IoGel - ileDPliY GLIA. TE)CA5
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008 Page 19 of 24
TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO 2006-35
AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 2DO241 PBZ, KNOWN AS PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT NO. 25, TROPHY WOOD BUSINESS CENTER, EXHIBIT "C",
"DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS", BY ADDING EXHIBIT "D" ENTITLED "SITE
PLANS", TO ADOPT A DETAILED FINAL SITE PLAN FOR TRACT 5;
PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION OF PREMISES; PROVIDING A FINAL
DETAILED SITE PLAN; PROVIDING A LANDSCAPE PLAN AND PLANT
LIST; PROVIDING BUILDING ELEVATIONS; PROVIDING SITE LINE
STUDIES; PROVIDING A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN AND LIGHT FIXTURE
ILLUSTRATIONS; PROVIDING SIGN CRITERIA; PROVIDING RETAINING
WALL AND FENCE CRITERIA; PROVIDING A DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE;
PROVIDING A SAVINGS AND REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR ENGROSSMENT AND
ENROLLMENT; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF
TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE AND A
SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED COMMITTED EACH DAY
DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS OR CONTINUES; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas (the "Town"), is
authorized and empowered by law, in accordance with Chapter 212 of the Texas Local
Government Cade, to regulate the subdivision of land and property development within the Town;
WHEREAS, on 2 December, 2002, the Town adopted Ordinance No. 2002-41 P&Z,
amending Ordinance No. 2000-06 P&Z of the Town, the same being the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance, and amending the official zoning map of the Town by changing the zoning on a
certain tract of land described as a 16.0 acre tract of land located generally to the North of State
Highway 114, West of T.W. King Road, and South of Hanna and Jamie Court, from it's then
current zoning of "CG', Commercial General, to PD Planned Development No. 25, Trophy Wood
Business Center, and
WHEREAS, the developer of Tract 5 has requested an amendment to PD -25 for the
purpose of seeking approval of a Final Detailed Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Plant List,
Building Elevations, Sight Line Studies, Photometric Plan and Light Fixture Illustrations, Sign
Criteria, Retaining Wall & Fence Criteria, and a Development Schedule, for Tract 5.
WHEREAS, all legal notices, requirements and conditions having been complied with,
the case to rezone the Land came before the Planning and Zoning Commission; and
WHEREAS, after public notices were given in compliance with State law and public
hearings were conducted, and after considering the information submitted at those public
hearings and all other relevant information and materials, the Planning and Zoning Commission
of the Town has recommended to the Town Council the adoption of the amendments to
Ordinance No. 2002-41 P&Z as set forth in this Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, after complying with all legal notices, requirements, and conditions, a public
hearing was held before Town Council at which the Town Council considered, among other
things, the character of the land and its suitability for particular uses, with a view of encouraging
the most appropriate use of land in the Town, and does hereby find that the rezoning approved
hereby accomplishes such objectives; and
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008 Page 20 of 24
WHEREAS, the Town Council has determined that there is a necessity and need for the
change in zoning and that the proposed change is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use
Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
TROPHY CLUB:
SECTION 1.
INCORPORATION OF PREMISES
That the above and foregoing premises are true and correct and are Incorporated herein
and made a part hereof for all purposes.
SECTION 2.
AMENDMENT
Ordinance No. 2002-41 P&Z of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, the same being PD
Planned Development No. 25, Trophy Wood Business Center, is hereby amended in the following
particulars, and all other articles, chapter, sections, paragraphs, sentence, phrases and words are
not amended by are hereby ratified and affirmed.
A. Final Detailed Site Plan: A Final Detailed Site Plan for the Land, and all parts
therefore, is attached hereto as Exhibit "5.1", Final Detailed Site Plan, and
incorporated herein as if copied in its entirety. The Final Detailed Site Plan shall
be adhered to in carrying out the development of the land and compliance with
each and every part of such Final Detailed Site Plan shall constitute as a
condition precedent to the issuance of any building permit for the land in the PD
Planned Development District.
B. Landscape Plan & Plant List: The landscape plan and plant list for Tract 5 of this
PD Planned Development are attached hereto as Exhibit "5.2", "Landscape Plan
and Plant List", and are incorporated herein as I copied in their entirety.
C. Buildino Elevations. The building elevations for Tract 5 of this PD Planned
Development are attached hereto as Exhibit "5.3", 'Building Elevations", and are
Incorporated herein as if copied in their entirety.
D.. Site Line Studies. The site line studies for Tract 5 of this PD Planned
Development are attached hereto as Exhibit "5.4", "Site Line Studies", and are
incorporated herein as if copied in their entirety.
E. Photometric Plan and Light Fixtures. A photometric plan and light fixture
requirements for Tract 5 of this PD Planned Development are sat forth in Exhibit
"5.5", "Photometric Plan and Light Fixtures", which is attached hereto and
incorporated hereln as if copied in its entirety.
F. Sion Criteria., Signage requirements for Tract 5 of this PD Planned Development
are set forth in Exhibit "5.6", "Sign Criteria", which is attached and incorporated
herein asif copied in its entirety.
G_ Retaining Wail and Fence Criteria. The retaining wall and fence requirements for
Tract 5 of this PD Planned Development are set forth In Exhibit "5.7", "Fiataining
Wall and Fence Criteria", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as it
copied in its entirety.
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008 Page 21 of 24
Development Schedule. The development schedule for Tract 5 of this PD
Planned development Is set forth in Exhibit °5.8", "Development Schedule",
which is attached hereto and Incorporated herein as if copied in its entirety.
SECTION 3.
SAVINGS AND REPEALER
That this Ordinance shall be cumulative of all other Ordinances of the Town affecting the
PD -25 and shall not repeal any of the provisions of such Ordinances except in those instances
where provisions of those Ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance;
whether such Ordinances are codified or uncodliied, and all other provisions of the Ordinances of
the Town of Trophy Club, codified or uncodified, not in conflict with the provisions of this
Ordinance, shall remain in full force and affect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any complaint,
action, cause of action or claim which prior to the effective date of this Ordinance has been
Initiated or has arlsen under or pursuant to such repealed Ordinance(s) shall continue to be
governed by the provisions of that Ordinance and for that purpose the Ordinance shall be
deemed to remain and continue in full force and effect.
SECTION 4.
SEVERABILITY
If any.section, article, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or ward in this Ordinance, or
application Hereof to any person or circumstance, is held Invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of
competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the
Ordinance, and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed such remaining portions
of the Ordinance despite such invalidity, which remaining portions shall remain In full force and
effect.
SECTION 5.
ENGROSSMENT AND ENROLLMENT
The Town Secretary of the Town of Trophy Club is hereby directed to engross and enrolt
this Ordinance by copying the exact Caption and Effective Date clause in the minutes of the Town
Council of the Town of Trophy Club and by filing this Ordinance in the Ordinance records of the
Town.
SECTION B.
PENALTY
It shall be unlawful for any person to violate any provision of this Ordinance, and any
person violating or failing to comply with any provlsion of this Ordinance shall be fined, upon
conviction, not less than One Dollar ($1.00) nor more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00),
and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation
occurs or continues.
SECTION 7,
EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall take effect from and after its date of passage in accordance with
law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the Town Council of the Town of Trophy Club, Texas, this 2"d day
of October, 200j .
ATTEST:
Mayor
Town of Trophy Club, Texas
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008 Page 22 of 24
Town 5ecratary
Town of Trophy Club, Texas
[SEAL]
APPROVED As TO FORM:
Qj7UCLkIJA 8,
Town Attorney
Town of Trophy Club, Texas
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008 Page 23 of 24
From:
(ch)
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM
The Office of the Planning and Zoning Coordinator
Subject: Agenda Item No.D.1
Adjournment.
Planning and Zoning Commission March 6, 2008
Date: 3-6-2008
Page 24 of 24